Public defence: Siw Tønnessen

Siw Tønnessen will defend her PhD degree in Person-centred Healthcare Research. Her dissertation explores meaningful everyday life for people in recovery from mental health- and/or substance abuse challenges.


25 Apr

Practical information

  • Date: 25 April 2025
  • Time: 10.00 - 15.00
  • Location: Drammen, Auditorium A5508 and Zoom
  • Download calendar file
  • Link to digital participation (Zoom)

     

    Programme

    10.00-11.00. Trial lecture: Present and discuss different theoretical and methodological implications of individual and contextual understandings of addiction in research on co-occurring mental health- and substance abuse problems.

    12.00-15.00. Public defence: Not the meaning of life, but meanings in everyday life. Social constructions of meaning in everyday life for people in recovery

    The public defence will be hosted by Professor Vibeke Sundling.

    Assessment committee

    Supervisors

    • Main supervisor: Professor Trude Klevan, University in South-eastern Norway
    • Co-supervisor: Professor Ottar Ness, Norwegian University of Science and Technology

     

     

Any questions?

Siw Tønnessen is defending her dissertation for the degree philosophiae doctor (PhD) at the University of South-Eastern Norway.

Siw Tønnessen

The doctoral work has been carried out at the Faculty of Health and Social Sciences.

You are invited to follow the trial lecture and the public defence:

Summary

Meaningfulness in everyday life is important for people in recovery from mental health and/or substance use challenges, but what constitutes a meaningful everyday life depends on who you ask. The answer you get depends on the perspective, focus, and position of the person answering.

The thesis has a social constructionist research design, and the research was carried out together with staff and residents of a supported housing facility for people with mental health and/or substance use challenges and together with a competence group. Data was constructed using focus group interviews, photovoice and autoethnography, and data was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and double hermeneutics, participant-driven analysis and analytical autoethnography.

The findings of the thesis show that what professionals believe contributes to meaning in everyday life for people in recovery may be something different from what the people themselves experience as meaningful. This is valuable knowledge that implies a willingness to explore what the individual experience as recovery promoting. It also implies exploring the individual's own resources, because people in recovery live with themselves even when the professionals are not at work. 

The findings show that professionals also need a meaningful everyday life, and that their working day can be a source of such meaning. The thesis requires a focus on justifications for practice; is it for example the service users, the professional's or the services' need for meaning that underlies the way practice is done.