Christine Rendahl Stenersen is defending her dissertation for the degree philosophiae doctor (PhD) at the University of South-Eastern Norway. 
The doctoral work has been carried out at the Faculty of Humanities, Sports, and Educational Science.
You are invited to follow the trial lecture and the public defence.
Summary
This doctoral thesis explores how learning outcomes-oriented policy takes shape both in policy documents and in classroom practices in Norwegian lower secondary schools.
The study takes as its point of departure the Knowledge Promotion Reform of 2006, which introduced a more outcomes-focused approach to education in Norway.
Through an analysis of government reports to Parliament from 2003-2017, the thesis demonstrates how the reform’s initial emphasis on fostering a culture for student learning gradually evolved into a system that prioritises individual student results. Over time, the concepts of culture for learning and learning outcomes became increasingly intertwined, reflecting a growing perceived need for measurable indicators to monitor quality in Norwegian schools.
The classroom studies show how teachers navigate the tension between diverse policy goals and students’ needs. They strive to combine elements that are easily assessed with competencies that are more challenging to evaluate, such as student engagement in learning processes and the development of collaboration skills. At the same time, the analyses demonstrate how students actively shape classroom practice in a more results-oriented direction. Students seek clear assessment criteria and are reluctant to engage in tasks without knowing how their efforts will be evaluated. In this way, students act as policy actors, influencing how education policy is enacted in the classroom and contributing to a narrowing of focus that reinforces a results-oriented practice.
Finally, the thesis proposes a framework for analysing the relationship between education policy and classroom practice offering new insights into how national reforms unfold in everyday school life. The analyses highlight how subtle, situated changes, referred to as nuance shifts, emerge through the interaction between policy frames and practice. These shifts tend to strengthen the emphasis on what is easily assessed and graded, with substantial implications for political ambitions to promote student collaboration and engagement in learning processes.